Who Is Michel Fournier? The Oregon Man Convicted of Murdering His Wife Susan “Phoenix” Lane & Where Is He Now? 2026 Update
Michel Fournier was a 71-year-old Oregon man whose wife, Susan “Phoenix” Lane, disappeared from their home near Mount Hood in November 2024, days after she served him with divorce papers. What began as a missing-person investigation developed into a murder case after detectives uncovered surveillance footage contradicting Fournier’s account of his movements.
His case is examined in 48 Hours: Murder at Mount Hood, airing Saturday, November 14, 2026, at 10/9c on CBS. Correspondent Peter Van Sant investigates the disappearance of Lane, the search that led to the discovery of her body and the evidence that resulted in Fournier’s conviction.
Lane, 61, lived with Fournier in Brightwood, Oregon, and worked at the Hoodland Bazaar in nearby Welches. She was the mother of two sons, Jesse and Dakota, and was devoted to her dogs, Elrond and Elros.
The couple had been married for approximately 12 years, but their relationship had deteriorated. Lane filed for divorce on October 31, 2024, and served Fournier with the documents on November 20.
Two days after she served the papers, Lane was reported missing when she failed to arrive at work. Her two dogs had disappeared with her.
Fournier told investigators that he had hitchhiked to Portland to obtain a vehicle part and returned to find his wife, her truck and the dogs missing. Surveillance recordings contradicted his account, showing him driving Lane’s truck with the animals inside.
On November 29, 2024, a community member discovered Lane’s body concealed beneath a tarp approximately 400 yards from the marital home. Investigators determined that she had been shot three times with a .22-calibre rifle.
Fournier was arrested and charged with murder. On March 5, 2026, a Clackamas County jury convicted him of second-degree murder and unlawful use of a weapon. Jurors also determined that the killing constituted domestic violence.
He was sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
As of November 2026, Fournier’s documented legal status is that of a convicted murderer serving a life sentence. His precise current correctional facility has not been confirmed, and the final outcome of separate animal abuse charges concerning Lane’s dogs has not been established.
- “Murder at Mount Hood”: 48 Hours Reports on Susan “Phoenix” Lane’s Homicide November 14 2026
- Who Was Susan “Phoenix” Lane? The Oregon Mother Murdered Near Mount Hood After Filing for Divorce – 2026 Update
Who Is Michel Fournier?
Michel Fournier is an Oregon man convicted of murdering his wife, Susan “Phoenix” Lane, in November 2024.
He was 71 years old when he was arrested and 72 when he was convicted and sentenced in March 2026.
Fournier lived with Lane in Brightwood, an unincorporated community in Clackamas County near Mount Hood.
The couple had been married for approximately 12 years and shared a home in the mountain community.
Before the murder, Fournier was known through his relationship with Lane and his presence in the local area.
The available public information does not establish a detailed account of his childhood, education, employment history or earlier marriages.
His name became the subject of national attention after Lane disappeared and investigators discovered evidence contradicting his explanation of what had happened.
The subsequent prosecution established that he was responsible for her murder.
Michel Fournier’s Life in Brightwood, Oregon
Fournier lived in Brightwood, a community along the Mount Hood corridor east of Portland.
The area is surrounded by forests, rivers and mountain roads, with residents living near the Mount Hood National Forest.
Fournier shared a home with Lane, who worked at the Hoodland Bazaar in Welches.
The property became central to the murder investigation because prosecutors argued that a dispute over the home provided a motive for the killing.
Lane held the home in her name.
As their marriage deteriorated, Fournier faced the prospect of changes to his living arrangements and property interests through the divorce proceedings.
The prosecution maintained that his concern about losing the home contributed to the murder.
The property also became important because Lane’s body was discovered approximately 400 yards away.
Investigators concluded that she had been killed at the Brightwood residence before her body was concealed nearby.
Michel Fournier’s Marriage to Susan “Phoenix” Lane
Fournier and Lane had been married for approximately 12 years when she disappeared.
Lane was a mother of two sons, Jesse and Dakota, and worked at the Hoodland Bazaar while living in Brightwood.
She was known to friends as Phoenix and maintained close relationships within the Mount Hood community.
Her two dogs, Elrond and Elros, were important companions.
By 2024, the marriage had deteriorated.
Lane began taking steps to end the relationship and protect her belongings.
Friends and prosecutors described concerns about her safety as the couple moved towards divorce.
The relationship became central to the criminal case because Lane was killed during the period in which she was seeking to end the marriage.
The jury would determine that her murder constituted domestic violence.
Why Susan Lane Wanted to Divorce Fournier
Lane filed for divorce from Fournier on October 31, 2024.
The court filing cited irreconcilable differences and an irreparable breakdown of the marriage.
The couple remained legally married when Lane was killed the following month.
The divorce proceedings raised questions about property, including the home where they lived.
Prosecutors argued that Fournier feared losing the property because it was in Lane’s name.
The prosecution presented that concern as a motive for the murder.
Lane had begun taking precautions involving her personal documents, belongings and dogs.
According to prosecutors, she brought important items to work rather than leaving them at the marital home.
Friends described her as concerned about Fournier’s behaviour.
Those circumstances became important during the investigation and trial because they established the conflict preceding her death.
The Divorce Papers Served on November 20, 2024
On November 20, 2024, Lane served Fournier with divorce papers.
The service followed the October 31 filing and represented a significant step towards ending the marriage.
The timing became important because Lane was last seen alive on November 21.
She was reported missing the following day.
Prosecutors argued that the impending divorce created a dispute over the couple’s home and other property.
The home was in Lane’s name, and the prosecution maintained that Fournier feared losing it.
The jury heard evidence concerning the divorce proceedings during the March 2026 murder trial.
The prosecution presented the timing as part of its explanation for the killing.
The legal proceedings established that Fournier murdered Lane during the breakdown of their marriage.
The jury also found that the crime constituted domestic violence.
The Warning Signs Before Susan Lane’s Death
Before her disappearance, Lane had taken measures to protect herself and her belongings.
According to prosecutors, she began bringing her dogs and important documents to work.
Her friends knew that she was preparing to leave the marriage.
They also described concerns about the relationship.
The precautions became significant after Lane disappeared because they provided context for the conflict between the couple.
Investigators examined the information while reconstructing her final days.
The prosecution argued that Fournier’s concern about the divorce and property created a motive for violence.
The available case information does not establish every incident that contributed to Lane’s fears.
What is documented is that she was pursuing divorce and taking precautions before her death.
Those circumstances formed part of the evidence presented against Fournier.
What Happened When Susan Lane Disappeared?
Lane was last seen alive on November 21, 2024.
The following day, she failed to arrive at work at the Hoodland Bazaar in Welches.
Her employer reported her missing after recognising that the absence was inconsistent with her normal behaviour.
Lane’s two dogs were also missing.
The disappearance raised concerns among friends, relatives and members of the Mount Hood community.
Search teams began examining the surrounding forests and mountain roads.
The initial investigation considered whether Lane had gone hiking with her dogs and become lost.
But friends questioned that possibility because of her familiarity with the area and the circumstances surrounding her marriage.
Investigators began examining the movements of people close to her, including Fournier.
His explanation would become an important part of the case.
Michel Fournier’s Account of His Wife’s Disappearance
Fournier told investigators that he had travelled to Portland to obtain a vehicle part.
He claimed that he had hitchhiked to the city.
According to his account, Lane’s truck and dogs were gone when he returned to the Brightwood home.
The explanation suggested that Lane had left while he was away.
Investigators examined his statements as they attempted to establish when Lane disappeared and what happened to her.
Detectives sought surveillance footage that could confirm his movements.
The recordings produced a different account.
Fournier had been captured driving Lane’s truck in Portland.
Her dogs were visible inside the vehicle.
The footage contradicted his claim that he had hitchhiked and that the truck and dogs had disappeared during his absence.
The Surveillance Footage That Exposed Fournier’s False Account
Investigators obtained surveillance recordings from an auto parts store in Portland.
The footage showed Fournier driving Lane’s truck.
Elrond and Elros were visible inside the vehicle.
The recordings were important because Fournier had claimed to have travelled to Portland by hitchhiking.
They also contradicted his statement that the truck and dogs were missing when he returned home.
The evidence placed him in possession of the vehicle and animals during the period investigators were examining.
Detectives used the footage to reconstruct his movements.
The contradiction raised questions about why Fournier had provided an inaccurate account.
The prosecution used the recordings to challenge his credibility and support its reconstruction of the events surrounding Lane’s disappearance.
The footage became one of the central pieces of evidence presented during the murder case.
Why Investigators Followed Fournier to the Columbia River
Additional surveillance recordings placed Lane’s truck near Northeast Marine Drive in Portland.
The road runs alongside the Columbia River.
Investigators examined the footage while tracing Fournier’s movements.
The recordings directed detectives towards an area where evidence might have been discarded.
Authorities searched the river and surrounding locations.
During the investigation, they recovered Lane’s destroyed cellphone from the Columbia River.
The discovery became significant because the phone was connected to the missing woman.
Its damaged condition and recovery location formed part of the prosecution’s evidence.
The phone was considered alongside the surveillance recordings and Fournier’s statements.
The prosecution argued that the evidence supported its account of efforts to conceal the crime.
Susan Lane’s Destroyed Cellphone
The recovery of Lane’s cellphone provided investigators with physical evidence connected to her disappearance.
The device was found in the Columbia River after surveillance footage placed her truck near the water.
Investigators examined the discovery as part of their effort to establish what happened after Lane was killed.
The phone’s condition raised questions about why it had been destroyed and discarded.
The prosecution considered the evidence alongside Fournier’s movements and the account he had given to police.
The available case information does not establish every forensic result obtained from the device.
Its importance concerned the connection between the location, the truck and the investigation into Lane’s death.
The recovery contributed to the prosecution’s reconstruction of Fournier’s actions.
It also provided another piece of evidence contradicting the account he had given when his wife was reported missing.
The Community Search for Susan Lane
While investigators examined Fournier’s statements, friends and volunteers continued searching for Lane.
The search involved people familiar with Brightwood, Welches and the Mount Hood National Forest.
Community members examined wooded areas, mountain roads and locations where Lane might have travelled with her dogs.
Her disappearance had prompted concern because she was considered dependable and had failed to arrive at work.
Friends questioned whether she had become lost during a hiking trip.
Some suspected that her husband might have been involved.
James Evans helped organise community search efforts.
Volunteers continued looking for Lane after initial searches failed to locate her.
Their persistence became important because a community member would discover her body near the marital home.
The search transformed a missing-person case into a homicide investigation.
Susan Lane’s Body Discovered on November 29, 2024
On November 29, 2024, a community member discovered Lane’s body concealed beneath a tarp.
The location was approximately 400 yards from the home she shared with Fournier.
The discovery came one week after she was reported missing.
It established that Lane had not become lost while hiking.
Investigators examined the scene and began reconstructing the circumstances of her death.
The proximity to the marital home became important to the prosecution.
The body had been concealed in a wooded area near the property.
The discovery supported the prosecution’s account that Fournier had attempted to hide the killing.
Authorities determined that Lane had suffered fatal gunshot wounds.
Fournier was arrested following the discovery.
How Michel Fournier Murdered Susan Lane
Investigators determined that Lane had been shot three times with a .22-calibre rifle.
The gunshot wounds involved her head, neck and chest.
Authorities concluded that she had been killed at the Brightwood home on November 22, 2024.
Her body was found concealed beneath a tarp approximately 400 yards away.
The prosecution presented the medical findings and location of the body as evidence of the killing.
The case also involved Fournier’s movements after Lane disappeared.
Surveillance footage showed him driving her truck with the dogs inside.
Investigators recovered her destroyed cellphone from the Columbia River.
The prosecution used the combined evidence to establish his responsibility for the murder.
In March 2026, the jury found him guilty of second-degree murder and unlawful use of a weapon.
What Happened to Elrond and Elros?
Lane’s dogs, Elrond and Elros, disappeared during the same period as their owner.
The animals were closely associated with Lane and were an important part of her daily life.
Their disappearance raised concerns among friends and searchers.
Surveillance footage later showed Fournier driving Lane’s truck with the dogs inside.
After Lane’s body was discovered, authorities continued searching for the animals.
On November 30, 2024, investigators recovered two dead dogs in the Mount Hood National Forest.
The bodies were transferred to Clackamas County authorities for examination.
The deaths became the subject of separate criminal allegations against Fournier.
He faced two counts of first-degree aggravated animal abuse.
Those charges remained pending when his murder sentence was announced in March 2026.
The Animal Abuse Charges Against Fournier
Fournier faced separate criminal charges concerning the deaths of Lane’s dogs.
Prosecutors identified the allegations as two counts of first-degree aggravated animal abuse.
The charges were distinct from the murder and weapon offences.
The jury’s March 2026 verdict concerned Lane’s death and the unlawful use of a weapon.
The animal abuse allegations were not resolved by that verdict.
When Clackamas County announced Fournier’s life sentence on March 6, 2026, prosecutors confirmed that the separate charges remained pending.
The available information does not establish whether those charges resulted in convictions, dismissals or another legal outcome after March 2026.
It would be inaccurate to describe Fournier as convicted of killing the dogs without confirmation of a separate verdict or plea.
The allegations formed part of the broader investigation because the animals disappeared with Lane.
Their deaths added to the loss experienced by her family and friends.
Why Prosecutors Said Fournier Killed His Wife
The prosecution argued that Fournier murdered Lane because he feared losing property during their divorce.
The couple had been married for approximately 12 years.
Lane filed for divorce on October 31, 2024, and served him with papers on November 20.
The home they shared was in Lane’s name.
Prosecutors maintained that Fournier feared losing access to the property as the marriage ended.
They presented that concern as a motive for murder.
The timing of the divorce proceedings became important because Lane was killed within days of serving the papers.
The prosecution also examined the precautions she had taken before her death.
The jury found Fournier guilty of second-degree murder.
It also determined that the killing constituted domestic violence.
Michel Fournier Arrested and Charged With Murder
Fournier was arrested on November 29, 2024, following the discovery of Lane’s body.
He was charged with second-degree murder and unlawful use of a weapon.
The arrest followed the investigation into his movements and the evidence recovered after his wife’s disappearance.
Surveillance footage had contradicted his claim that he hitchhiked to Portland.
Investigators had also recovered Lane’s destroyed cellphone from the Columbia River.
The discovery of her body near the marital home provided further evidence.
Fournier was 71 years old when he was arrested.
The charges exposed him to a lengthy prison sentence.
The case proceeded through the Clackamas County court system.
His trial took place in March 2026.
The Evidence Against Michel Fournier
The prosecution presented evidence concerning the breakdown of Fournier’s marriage and Lane’s efforts to obtain a divorce.
The divorce proceedings established a timeline of conflict before the killing.
Prosecutors argued that Fournier feared losing the home they shared.
The property was in Lane’s name.
The prosecution also presented surveillance recordings contradicting Fournier’s account of travelling to Portland.
The footage showed him driving Lane’s truck with the dogs inside.
Additional recordings placed the vehicle near the Columbia River.
Investigators recovered Lane’s destroyed cellphone from the water.
The prosecution also relied on the discovery of Lane’s body near the marital home and the medical findings establishing that she had been shot three times.
The combined evidence formed the basis of the murder case.
Michel Fournier’s Murder Trial in March 2026
Fournier stood trial in Clackamas County Circuit Court in March 2026.
He faced charges of second-degree murder and unlawful use of a weapon.
The proceedings lasted approximately a week.
Prosecutors presented evidence concerning the divorce, the disappearance and the discovery of Lane’s body.
The jury heard about Fournier’s statements to investigators and the surveillance footage contradicting his account.
Evidence also concerned the destroyed cellphone recovered from the Columbia River.
The prosecution examined the medical findings establishing that Lane had been shot three times.
The defence contested the charges.
Following the presentation of evidence and closing arguments, the jury began deliberating.
The verdict was delivered on March 5, 2026.
The Jury Finds Michel Fournier Guilty
On March 5, 2026, a Clackamas County jury found Fournier guilty of second-degree murder and unlawful use of a weapon.
The verdict followed approximately five hours of deliberation.
Jurors also determined that the killing constituted domestic violence.
The finding reflected the fact that Fournier had murdered his wife during the breakdown of their marriage.
The verdict established his criminal responsibility for Lane’s death.
It followed the prosecution’s presentation of evidence concerning the divorce, his movements and the discovery of her body.
The jury rejected the defence’s challenge to the charges.
The decision brought the murder trial to a close more than 15 months after Lane disappeared.
The court proceeded to sentencing.
Family members and friends were given an opportunity to describe the impact of the crime.
Dakota Lane Confronts Michel Fournier in Court
Dakota Lane, one of Susan Lane’s sons, addressed Fournier during the sentencing proceedings.
He spoke about his feelings towards the man convicted of murdering his mother.
His statement included the words, “I never liked you from the moment I met you.”
He also described the anger he felt during the hearing.
The statement reflected the consequences of the murder for Lane’s family.
Dakota’s appearance came after the jury had established Fournier’s guilt.
Victim impact statements allow relatives to describe the harm caused by a crime.
They form part of the sentencing process rather than the determination of guilt.
For Lane’s family, the hearing provided an opportunity to address Fournier after the conclusion of the murder trial.
The proceedings marked an important stage in the criminal case.
Susan Lane’s Friends Speak at Sentencing
Lane’s friends also addressed the court following Fournier’s conviction.
Cari Gesch described Phoenix as a strong and independent woman.
She said friends had suspected Fournier’s involvement from the beginning of the disappearance.
Her comments reflected the concerns that had motivated the community search.
Khristen Prudence spoke about the deaths of Lane and her dogs.
She acknowledged that the verdict could not bring Phoenix, Elrond or Elros back.
The statements reflected the impact of the killing beyond Lane’s immediate family.
Friends had participated in the search and followed the investigation.
Their presence at sentencing demonstrated the connections Lane had developed within the Mount Hood community.
The hearing gave them an opportunity to describe the person they had lost.
Michel Fournier Sentenced to Life Imprisonment
Following the guilty verdict, Fournier was sentenced to life imprisonment.
The sentence included the possibility of parole after 25 years.
He was 72 years old at the time of sentencing.
The punishment followed his convictions for second-degree murder and unlawful use of a weapon.
The jury’s domestic violence finding formed part of the legal outcome.
The sentence requires Fournier to serve a substantial period in prison before becoming eligible for parole consideration.
Parole eligibility does not guarantee release.
A decision would depend on the applicable law and the circumstances at the time of review.
The sentence brought the murder prosecution to a close.
Separate animal abuse charges remained pending when the sentence was announced.
What Did Fournier’s Defence Attorney Say?
Following the sentencing, defence attorney Shannon Kmetic addressed the court.
She acknowledged the emotional burden associated with the case.
Kmetic also spoke about the importance of domestic violence proceedings within the criminal justice system.
Her comments came after the jury had returned guilty verdicts and the court imposed a life sentence.
The defence had represented Fournier throughout the criminal proceedings and challenged the prosecution’s allegations.
The jury’s verdict established his guilt on the murder and weapon charges.
The sentencing hearing brought together the legal outcome and statements from those affected by the killing.
For Lane’s family and friends, the proceedings provided a public acknowledgement of the harm caused by her death.
Where Is Michel Fournier Now in November 2026?
Michel Fournier’s documented legal status as of November 2026 is that of a convicted murderer sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
He was convicted on March 5, 2026, and sentenced following the jury’s verdict.
The conviction concerned the murder of his wife, Susan “Phoenix” Lane, and unlawful use of a weapon.
The jury also determined that the killing constituted domestic violence.
Fournier was 72 years old when sentenced.
His precise current correctional facility has not been established through the available information.
The sentence means he faces decades of imprisonment before parole consideration.
If the 25-year minimum is calculated from the March 2026 sentencing date, the corresponding period would extend to approximately 2051, although time-served credits and applicable sentencing rules could affect the calculation.
No confirmed information in the case materials establishes that his murder conviction has been overturned or that he has been released.
When Will Michel Fournier Be Eligible for Parole?
Fournier received a life sentence with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
The sentence followed his March 2026 conviction for second-degree murder.
A 25-year minimum means he must serve the required period before he can be considered for parole.
The precise eligibility date depends on how the Oregon correctional system calculates the sentence, including any applicable credit for time spent in custody before sentencing.
Fournier was arrested in November 2024 and sentenced in March 2026.
That period of pretrial detention may be relevant to the calculation.
Parole eligibility does not mean that a prisoner is entitled to release.
The relevant authorities would assess the case under the laws and procedures in force at the time.
Because Fournier was already in his 70s when sentenced, he would be an elderly prisoner by the time the minimum period expires.
The available information does not establish a confirmed parole eligibility date from an official correctional record.
Did Michel Fournier Admit Killing Susan Lane?
The supplied accounts of Fournier’s case establish that he was convicted following a jury trial.
They do not document a confession in which he admitted murdering Lane.
During the missing-person investigation, Fournier claimed that his wife had disappeared while he was away in Portland.
He said he had hitchhiked to obtain a vehicle part and returned to find her truck and dogs missing.
Investigators obtained surveillance footage contradicting that account.
The recordings showed him driving Lane’s truck with the dogs inside.
The prosecution presented the evidence as part of its case against him.
A jury found Fournier guilty of second-degree murder and unlawful use of a weapon.
His conviction was based on the evidence presented at trial rather than a documented admission of guilt.
The verdict established his criminal responsibility for Lane’s murder.
The Domestic Violence Finding Against Fournier
The jury determined that Lane’s murder constituted domestic violence.
The finding reflected the relationship between the victim and the convicted offender.
Lane and Fournier had been married for approximately 12 years.
They were in the process of divorcing when she was killed.
Prosecutors argued that Fournier feared losing the home they shared.
The property was in Lane’s name, and the divorce proceedings created a dispute over its future.
Lane had taken precautions involving her belongings, documents and dogs before her death.
The prosecution used those circumstances to explain the conflict preceding the murder.
The domestic violence finding became part of the legal outcome.
It placed the killing within the context of an intimate relationship marked by conflict and separation.
How the Case Affected the Mount Hood Community
Lane’s disappearance prompted an extensive community search.
Friends, volunteers and search-and-rescue personnel examined the forests and roads surrounding Brightwood and Mount Hood.
Her absence from work raised concerns because she was considered dependable.
The disappearance of her dogs added to those concerns.
Some friends suspected that the circumstances surrounding her marriage were connected to her disappearance.
Community members continued searching until her body was discovered.
The finding on November 29, 2024, transformed the investigation into a homicide case.
The subsequent prosecution attracted attention because the victim had been preparing to leave her marriage.
Friends and family participated in the sentencing proceedings and described the impact of her death.
The case became associated with the risks of domestic violence during the breakdown of a relationship.
Michel Fournier’s Case in 48 Hours: Murder at Mount Hood
48 Hours examines Fournier’s conviction and the murder of Susan “Phoenix” Lane in “Murder at Mount Hood.”
Correspondent Peter Van Sant reports on the investigation and the community search that led to the discovery of her body.
The episode features Lane’s sons Jesse and Dakota, her brother Mike Lane and friends Sarah Caswell, Khristen Prudence and Cari Gesch.
Their accounts provide insight into Lane’s life, the breakdown of her marriage and the concerns surrounding her disappearance.
James Evans discusses the community search effort.
Clackamas County Sheriff’s Deputy Aaron Clark and detectives Jim White and Alex Monarch provide perspectives on the investigation.
Prosecutors John Millar and Alexander Hayes examine the evidence presented against Fournier.
The programme revisits the surveillance footage, the recovery of Lane’s cellphone and the murder trial.
It also examines the verdict that resulted in Fournier receiving a life sentence.
What Happened to Michel Fournier?
Michel Fournier was living in Brightwood, Oregon, with his wife Susan “Phoenix” Lane when she began divorce proceedings in October 2024.
The couple had been married for approximately 12 years.
Lane filed for divorce on October 31 and served Fournier with papers on November 20.
She was last seen alive on November 21 and reported missing the following day after failing to arrive at work.
Her two dogs, Elrond and Elros, disappeared with her.
Fournier told investigators that he had hitchhiked to Portland to obtain a vehicle part and returned to find Lane, her truck and the dogs missing.
Surveillance footage contradicted his account, showing him driving the truck with the dogs inside.
Additional recordings placed the vehicle near the Columbia River, where investigators recovered Lane’s destroyed cellphone.
On November 29, a community member discovered Lane’s body beneath a tarp approximately 400 yards from the marital home.
Investigators determined that she had been shot three times with a .22-calibre rifle.
Fournier was arrested and charged with murder.
On March 5, 2026, a Clackamas County jury found him guilty of second-degree murder and unlawful use of a weapon.
Jurors also determined that the killing constituted domestic violence.
He was sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
Separate aggravated animal abuse charges concerning Lane’s dogs remained pending when his murder sentence was announced in March 2026.
As of November 2026, Fournier’s documented legal status is that of a convicted murderer serving a life sentence. His precise current prison location has not been verified.
His case is examined in 48 Hours: Murder at Mount Hood, airing Saturday, November 14, 2026, at 10/9c on CBS, with streaming on Paramount+.
More “Murder at Mount Hood”
- “Murder at Mount Hood”: 48 Hours Reports on Susan “Phoenix” Lane’s Homicide November 14 2026
- Who Was Susan “Phoenix” Lane? The Oregon Mother Murdered Near Mount Hood After Filing for Divorce – 2026 Update
- Who Is Michel Fournier? The Oregon Man Convicted of Murdering His Wife Susan “Phoenix” Lane & Where Is He Now? 2026 Update
